STUDI KASUS PERILAKU DAKTILITAS STRUKTUR BANGUNAN 20 LANTAI TERHADAP DEFISIENSI MUTU BETON MENGGUNAKAN METODE PUSHOVER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52453/t.v16i1.455Keywords:
concrete deficiency, mid-rise buildings, structural ductility, nonlinear static analysis, structural R-value.Abstract
Concrete strength deficiency in building affects structural ductility. This study aims to evaluate the ductility of structures when using the designed concrete strength and to assess the impact when concrete experiences deficiencies. The analysis involves three building with varying width-to-length ratios, identified as buildings A, B, and C. The width-to-length ratios are 1:3 for building A, 1:4 for building B, and 1:5 for building C. Each building model is analyzed using four uniform concrete strengths: 25 MPa as the design strength, followed by 20, 15, and 10 MPa.
Structural ductility is determined using nonlinear static (pushover) analysis with ETABS software, based on the seismic design provisions of SNI 1726:2019. From this, the structural response modification factor (R) can be obtained. The average ductility results from all models show a linear decrease to the reduction in concrete strength. Regarding the effect of span ratio, there is a tendency for ductility to decrease as the building becomes more elongated. The percentage reduction in ductility from 25 to 10 MPa is 39% for building A, 46% for building B, and 50% for building C. The ductility and R values at 15 and 10 MPa fall below the minimum requirements specified in SNI 1726:2019.
References
Agung Riyadhi, Wachid Hasyim, dan Nono Suhana. (2021). Perbandingan Respon Struktur Gedung Menggunakan Respon Spektra SNI 1726:2012 dan SNI 1726:2019. Jurnal Rekayasa Infrastruktur, ISSN: 2460-335X, e-ISSN: 2686-
Fazriyati Utami, Lindung Zalbuin Mase, Fepy Supriani, dan Yoka Mahendra. (2023). Pemanfaatan Analisis Perambatan Gelombang Seismik dan Implementasinya pada Struktur Bangunan. Jurnal Potensi Sipil Politeknik. Vol. 25, No. 1, April 2023.
FEMA 440 (2005). “Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures”, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
FEMA P-1050-1, 2015, National earthquake hazards reduction program (NEHRP) recommended gempa provisions for new buildings and other structures, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
Idham Nasution, Erizal, dan Muhammad Fauzan. (2024). Evaluasi Kinerja Struktur Gedung Bertingkat di Jakarta Menggunakan Pushover Analysis. Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan, Vol. 09 No. 02, Oktober 2024, IPB University, Bogor.
Liza Hani Agustamara. (2024). Pengaruh Pertumbuhan Penduduk terhadap Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan Terbangun di Kota Administrasi Jakarta Timur Tahun 2010–2020. Skripsi, Program Studi Tadris Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Nelson Hutahean, Janter Napitupulu, dan Silvester Nduru. (2020). Analisis Dinamis Gaya Gempa pada Bangunan Berdasarkan SNI 03-1726 2012. Universitas Darma Agung, Medan. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil, Vol. 9, No. 2, Agustus 2020, hlm. 91–100.
Ocsen Gregorius Talinusa, Ruddy Tenda, dan Winny J. Tamboto. (2014). Pengaruh Dimensi Benda Uji terhadap Kuat Tekan Beton. Fakultas Teknik, Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado. Jurnal Sipil Statik, Vol. 2, No. 7, November 2014, hlm. 344–351
Rolas Siregar, Ericzon Turnip, dan Rahelina Ginting. (2022). Perencanaan Kuat Tekan dan Tarik Beton Menggunakan Agregat dari Desa Janji Kab. Labura f’c 30 MPa (Studi Laboratorium). Universitas Darma Agung, Medan. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil, Vol. 11, No. 1, Februari 2022, hlm. 12–20. SNI 03-1726-2012. Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan Non Gedung. Badan Standarisasi Nasional.
SNI 03-1726-2019. Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan Non Gedung. Badan Standarisasi Nasional.
SNI 03-2847-2019. Persyaratan Beton Struktural untuk Bangunan Gedung. Badan Standarisasi Nasional.
